All, Do we want to keep the vote open or should I close it as failed? It's been nearly a month since I called it.
I am +1 for making these the official packages as I haven't encountered any problem with them so far. If we could get two more PMC members to vote so we can close this vote that'd be great! -Renan On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:35 PM, Renan DelValle <re...@apache.org> wrote: > Friendly reminder that this vote is still open, please vote! > > > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Renan DelValle <re...@apache.org> wrote: > >> All, >> >> I propose that we accept the following artifacts as the official deb and >> rpm packaging for >> Apache Aurora 0.20.x: >> >> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/ >> >> --- >> >> The branch used to create the packaging is: >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging >> .git;a=tree;hb=refs/heads/0.20.x >> >> The packages are available at: >> https://dl.bintray.com/rdelvalle/aurora/ >> >> The GPG keys used to sign the packages are available at: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/aurora/KEYS >> >> Please download, verify, and test. Detailed test instructions are >> available here: >> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=aurora-packaging >> .git;a=tree;f=test;hb=refs/heads/0.20.x >> >> >> The vote will close on Mon Apr 9 18:45:00 PDT 2018 or later >> >> [ ] +1 Release these as the deb and rpm packages for Apache Aurora 0.20.x >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release these artifacts because... >> > >
