Looks like we're all pretty much on board with this idea. This thread was made with the intention to see if anyone opposed the idea so I'll call the actual vote now. Sorry for the confusion!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:38 AM Santhosh Kumar Shanmugham <sshanmug...@twitter.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:37 AM Mauricio Garavaglia < > mauriciogaravag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:01 AM, David McLaughlin < > dmclaugh...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks for kicking off the vote! > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 5:27 PM, Renan DelValle <re...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > I wanted to bring up for discussion moving the project from our > current > > > > ReviewBoard based workflow to a GitHub pull request based workflow > > > through > > > > the use of the ASF's GitBox service[1]. > > > > > > > > The GitBox service would allow us to read/write to our GitHub > > repository > > > > instead of only mirroring our Apache hosted repository. This means > we'd > > > be > > > > able to take pull requests through the GitHub platform instead of > > taking > > > > patches though ReviewBoard. > > > > > > > > It's worth mentioning that the Aurora community is responsible for > two > > > > repositories: aurora and aurora-packaging. I believe moving to this > > model > > > > would greatly simplify our patch submission process and would lower > the > > > > barrier of entry to new contributors for both of these repositories. > > > > > > > > Looking forward to hearing the community's thoughts on this idea. > > > > > > > > - Renan > > > > > > > > [1] https://reference.apache.org/committer/git > > > > > > > > > >
