> It seems the addition of the PUnitTestCase means the junit jar is needed > to compile. I'd like to add a check for it like framework has... does > that sound ok? Also, would be desirable/feasible to exclude the > dependant code if junit is not found?
+1 -ph __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
