> From: Leo Simons
>
> Leo Sutic wrote:
> > Which outlines all that I think is wrong with GUMP.
> >
> > 1) You can't try it yourself locally before committing.
>
> you can but it is a pain in the $*!# to setup as you need
> gigs and gigs
> of diskspace and running it takes a long time.
Yes, but with a remote and local repository that is updated
as needed and blah blah blah blah - you know how to
improve this, right, so I don't have to say it?
I get it:
1. Gump is big and ugly because it has to work with
Ant buildfiles.
2. Gump has to work with Ant buildfiles because it is
so big and ugly that no one would use a new buildfile
format designed specifically for gump.
> You should understand the context in which GUMP was created
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/why.html). It has broken quite a few
> lances for continuous integration, and it does its job.
I understand the context, and I understand why it ended up the way
it is. What I don't like is that it stopped there.
> Until
> there is a better alternative one should be moderate with criticism,
> or act on it :D
But I ***am*** acting on it! What, you mean whining doesn't count?
/LS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
