Stephen,
I do understand. My point is simply that rather than just say that Peter's
"statement was and remains blatantly inaccurate and completely misleading",
I would have asked him why he thinks that the solution you posted has the
same problem(s). Considering that we are talking about a program output, it
is subjectable to verification and peer review. Who knows? Perhaps he is
wrong, perhaps his system is fubar, perhaps there is a difference in
understanding of the problem.
In this vein ...
Stephen:
> > The avalon-sandbox/apliance package includes a utility class that
> > addresses and resolves this issue.
Peter:
> nope - has same problem.
Peter, what makes you think that it has the same problem? Have you verified
this? If so, can you post an example?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
