On Friday 14 March 2003 20:02, Peter Donald wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:10, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> > This is the problem and Peter appears to be the only one *really*
> > watching over what's going on in this project. Probably because he's
> > doing some sneaky moves himself so he's more sensible about them.
>
> Please don't. I have been fairly open about what I am going to be doing
> over next bit.
>
> I am moving all the code out that I am sole author for. I am encouraging
> others to do the same - I hope within a few months that most of avalon-apps
> will be gone and significant portions of excalibur will also be gone. Paul
> has already moved some stuff out, as has Eung-Ju and I. I have been poking
> the other Peter to do the same.
>
> In time I will start poking some of the Cocoon peeps to migrate some of the
> Cocoon originated stuff back into Cocoon - much better for Cocoon that way
> and hopefully better for Avalon.
>
> Post fortress release I intend to attempt to get framework cleaned up;
> marker interfaces, component.*, *Selectors deprecated. Provide a solid
> ECM-> fortress migration path and finally start process of dumping the
> crappy code we have been carrying for ages.
>
> At the same time I have consolidating Phoenix. Basically means getting unit
> tests solid and trying to get 95% test coverage on all the supporting
> libraries. I also plan to make it more agile by reducing dependencies,
> reducing duplication, internal decoupling and so forth.
>
> In the end I want to see the majority of cornerstone/excalibur/apps gone.
> Framework to be half deprecated, docs to be decrufted. Hows that for
> sneaky?


Hooahh, and how much of that will affect me, just starting to migrate my 
"legacy" application to Avalon-Phoenix?? Not at all? A little bit?

Niclas

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to