On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 17:53, Leo Simons wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > Paul Hammant wrote: > > > >> Would anyone mind if I added PicoContainer compatability to the > >> ConnectionManager, ThreadManager > >> etc components formerly known as Cornerstone? > > > <snip/> > > > >> Thoughts? > > > > like the idea, but some reservations :D > > I'm reversing direction completely. A little bit of experimentation over > the holidays (yes I'm an addict) has shown me that "type III IoC" is, in > fact, one of the best ideas of 2003 I've seen so far. I hope to write > and donate to picocontainer an essay lining out why, but in the meantime > I'd just want to point out to y'all my reservations are henceforth lifted. >
Correct me if I'm wrong, but type III is defined by the servicing of components via the constructor, right? I'm interested in PicoContainer, but I'm not completely convinced it's better for all cases. I'll be watching for your essay. -- jaaron <http://jadetower.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
