----- Original Message ----- From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The delegators make it easier to perform the lifecycle management once the > component has been properly "parsed". This allows the developer the most > freedom possible including coding with method names in their native tongue > (I used Spanish above because I can at least know a couple words in that > language). Nonsense. I'm from Brazil and I don't see any advantage of use portuguese to name my methods. Everything else is in english, why my service ou configure methods should be in portuguese? More: using attributes to define the "role" or dependency is fine, but use it to define lifecycle method is a bad idea. This would requires a lot of attributes checking through reflection resulting - at least - in a poor performance. My opnion: interfaces are just fine. Seems to me that everyones who start a project in .net wants to use attributes to everything. I used to do that... :-) my two cents. hammett MCAD Meet Polyethylene at http://polyethy.sourceforge.net/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
