Stephen McConnell wrote:
Berin Loritsch wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Stephen McConnell wrote: >> No. I didn't ask for the ramifications .. I just asked you >> what your underlying reasons were. Presumably you are trying >> to do *something* and its not easy to do. >> >> What is that *something*?
What is it that you are trying to do and cannot do with the existing attributes specification?
Integrate with Fortress easily.
Specifically what? Can you try and expand just a little? Something concrete would go a long way in clarifying your desire to change a perfectly good package. As things stand you have only presented the desire but the rationalization sucks big time. Let's stop the discussion on solutions to an undeclared problem - and get down to the actual declaration of the problem - your statement "Integrate with Fortress easily" does not provide me with anything useful.
You still have not answered the question .... are you using attributes? If so, what are the limitations you have? If not, why no?
Tone it down big guy. I am juggling three different thought processes currently, and I am not in a position to give a more clear answer just yet. Maybe later, but right now I am juggling too many things and quite frankly the ones that pay me have higher priority.
Oh, OK, so you have not actually tried to use what is already there. Gosh, I thought that maybe you were dealing with a real problem.
My apologies.
Stephen.
-- |------------------------------------------------| | Magic by Merlin | | Production by Avalon | | | | http://avalon.apache.org/merlin | | http://dpml.net/ | |------------------------------------------------|
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
