Ok, if I got this straight, this JMX facility will end up in
------------------ ------------------- -------- | ContainmentModel | --* | ComponentModel(s) |
| Merlin | -- ------------------ ------------------- -------- -------------------
| JMX View of above |
-------------------
In another approach a facility - combined with a lifecycle extension - could
replace the instance of the real component with a manageable one. Then you
will end with a single view of the components, now in a manageable proxy.
OK - some questions:
If a facility represents a management view of the above (which is what I have in mind) - the facility is managing potentially 1..n instances. There is also a cardinality question - we cannot have multiple managers of a component model - one model - one manager. This is the logic behind my thoughts that this is *not* a lifecycle extension scenario.
Are we on a similar track?
Stephen.
--
|------------------------------------------------| | Magic by Merlin | | Production by Avalon | | | | http://avalon.apache.org/merlin | | http://dpml.net/merlin/distributions/latest | |------------------------------------------------|
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
