> Sorry, but you manage to make me pretty upset... It happens.
> I do consider you on the "Complexity Bench", as I understand Castle is > borrowing a lot of the "apparent complexity" from Merlin. But I also > recognize that you have many other views as well. And I already state "I'm shooting my own foot" yesterday. > I don't need to state any names. It is easy to have opinion, if you don't need > to back it with putting in time to make it happen. If you don't put in time, > your opinion will be noted, appreciated (even if I don't agree with it) and > processed accordingly. Again, committment is not committs in CVS. One spent a lot of time answering this very list. > Why not look at the commits for 2004? Want to go further back? Just the number > of entries in CVS mailing list; > <...> > How do you want to rate "contribution" ? Please put a number on it ! Read above. > Maybe my logic is incredibly flawed, but I interpret you are argument against > yourself. > > Your argument goes something like; > "We are not a Company -> I should do what I think is right." > "I should not do what I think is right, but what other people is telling me is > right." - We are not a Company -> We don't have an hierachy. - One should not do want he thinks is best alone. - Nobody is gonna tell you what is right, but at least you should ASK for what you thinking is right and get a lazy-consensus. In other words, your contribution must stay in sync with the community. No more, no less. -- hammett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
