Guys, This got me thinking Hammet,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia - SPO) > > > So I'm close to just disallowing any explicit dependencies. > > Do you see any possiblity of dependencies that aren't loggers? > What about having aspects provide their own monitor interfaces? This way the kernel can use a logging aspect if one is available to spin (ahem CGLIB) its own monitor implementation for logging and register it with the aspect. This way there is no dependency. Monitoring occurs out of the box using a do nothing monitor adapter setup by default in the aspect until another more interesting monitor is set. I think the best motif for us to leverage rests along the lines of using callback based event notification which is what a monitor is all about, to inject aspects into the kernel without imposing dependencies between them. Whatchayal tink? Or is this too much magic already? Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
