On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looking at the gump descriptor - the above are included as optional > runtime dependencies (assuming I'm understanding the gump descriptor > correctly): > > <option project="jdbc" runtime="true"/> > <option project="jms" runtime="true"/> > <option project="javamail" runtime="true"/> > <option project="jaf" runtime="true"/> > <option project="jakarta-servletapi-4" runtime="true"/> > <option project="logging-log4j" runtime="true"/> > > Should we simply change "option" to "depend"?
If we cannot compile logkit without them, then by all means, yes. <option> is only useful if your project uses conditional compilation or processing based on the presence of the dependencies. Running checkstyle if it is present would be an example, or all the optional tasks of Ant that are only compiled if the dependency is there. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
