On Sunday 11 April 2004 21:11, Shash Chatterjee wrote: > We need to define ways to make the containers more flexible, > not tied to a rigid spec.
Now you are touching on the "Essence of Dispute" :o) Is Avalon about Containers or about Components ? If it is about containers, then I am banging my head in vain, that is fairly clear. IMHO, there are NO components out there worth the name, and IMHO Avalon should take the charge and get a proper component specification in place that should be as important to the Java community as the IC and "printed circuit board" was to the electronics industry. Niclas -- +---------//-------------------+ | http://www.bali.ac | | http://niclas.hedhman.org | +------//----------------------+ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
