> -----Original Message----- > From: Leo Sutic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Seriously, though, I have found it easier to put in the > container: > > 1. The ability to uniquely name each component.
1. Uniquely identify (name adds human connotation)? > 2. Nothing more. > > And then build the failover/distribution on top of that, > customized for the application. As long as I can route > events/requests to the corresponding components in > other JVMs, failover etc. isn't that hard. I think generalized failover out of the box can be achieved. However fine tuning it with customizations for an application should be possible. Both options should be available. One is good for RAD of fault tolerant services and the other is for fine tuning this feature for the specific application. Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
