[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12966282#action_12966282 ]
Doug Cutting commented on AVRO-703: ----------------------------------- Looks good. Is performance appreciably better than over HTTP? I'd expect we might see a significant difference with one-way messages. To test this we might: . extend Python's tool.py to use socket client & server when uri is "avro:" . extend Java's RpcSendTool and RpcReceiveTool to use sockets for "avro:" uris . change share/test/interop/bin/test_rpc_interop.sh to test using these "avro:" uris > socket transport for Python > --------------------------- > > Key: AVRO-703 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-703 > Project: Avro > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: python > Affects Versions: 1.4.1 > Reporter: Eric Evans > Assignee: Eric Evans > Priority: Minor > Attachments: 0001-python-socket-transceiver.patch > > > Python users need a more performant alternative to HTTP transport. Patch to > follow. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.