On 9/21/11 3:48 PM, "Doug Cutting" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 09/21/2011 02:55 PM, Stephen Gargan wrote: >> As a suggestion, I could try to veto the integration testing as part of >>the >> normal build and separate it into a profile. The profile could be run >>during >> development but otherwise be omitted from builds. It would remove the >> independent verification you get from the continuous integration, but it >> might be acceptable in this situation as the sample projects are pretty >> static. > >Could we change it so that this integration test is only run with 'mvn >install' and not with 'mvn verify'? I think we can do that by binding the execution phase of the integration test to install. If that works, it would be the best option IMO -- we won't catch problems with simple 'mvn test', but will surely before a release. These samples will rarely need to change anyway, and if so the change should be minor. > >Doug
