Scott, This sounds like a good idea.
Do you want to file an issue and patch for this or should I? Doug On 10/15/2011 07:21 PM, Scott Carey wrote: > We should consider updating our dependencies where appropriate. > > * We can use a newer Apache parent project version. > > Maven versions report: > [INFO] The following dependencies in Dependency Management have newer > versions: > [INFO] net.sf.jopt-simple:jopt-simple ...................... 3.2 -> > 4.0-beta1 > [INFO] org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-core ................... 0.20.2 -> > 0.20.204.0 > [INFO] org.codehaus.jackson:jackson-mapper-asl ............... 1.7.3 -> > 1.9.0 > [INFO] org.jboss.netty:netty ..................... 3.2.4.Final -> > 3.2.5.Final > [INFO] org.xerial.snappy:snappy-java ..................... 1.0.3.2 -> > 1.0.4.1 > > > [INFO] The following dependencies in Dependencies have newer versions: > [INFO] junit:junit ............................................ 4.8.2 -> > 4.10 > [INFO] org.slf4j:slf4j-api ................................... 1.6.1 -> > 1.6.2 > [INFO] org.slf4j:slf4j-simple ................................ 1.6.1 -> > 1.6.2 > [INFO] org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api .................... 2.0.10 -> > 3.0.3 > [INFO] org.apache.maven:maven-project ................. 2.0.10 -> > 3.0-alpha-2 > [INFO] org.apache.ant:ant .................................... 1.7.1 -> > 1.8.2 > [INFO] org.apache.velocity:velocity ...................... 1.6.4 -> > 1.7-beta1 > > > [INFO] The following plugin updates are available: > [INFO] org.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin .................... 1.2 -> > 1.2.1 > [INFO] maven-surefire-plugin ................................... 2.6 -> > 2.10 > [INFO] maven-plugin-plugin ...................................... 2.7 -> > 2.9 > [INFO] maven-jar-plugin ..................................... 2.3.1 -> > 2.3.2 > [INFO] maven-antrun-plugin ...................................... 1.3 -> > 1.6 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/7/11 2:11 PM, "Doug Cutting" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'd like to try to release 1.6.0 soon, perhaps making a release >> candidate next week. Are there particular issues that folks would like >> to get into 1.6.0 that are not yet committed? I hope include AVRO-803. >> >> Doug >
