[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13420794#comment-13420794
]
Scott Carey commented on AVRO-939:
----------------------------------
That is what it looks like -- a modest gain for larger sizes and a loss for
smaller sizes. I have not had time to look into more details. I suspect there
are some ways to improve the 10 byte time. It would be useful to see a few
other data points around that -- 5 bytes, 25 bytes, 50 bytes. The slowdown
for smaller sizes is an issue, and the modest improvement for larger ones is a
surprise. There may be something getting in the way of better improvements
there as well -- or the JVM is doing a better job than expected optimizing this.
> Java: optimize BinaryData#compareBytes() to use sun.misc.Unsafe when available
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-939
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-939
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: java
> Affects Versions: 1.7.1
> Reporter: Doug Cutting
> Attachments: AVRO-939-1.patch, AVRO-939-2.patch, AVRO-939-3.patch,
> AVRO-939-4.patch, AVRO-939.patch
>
>
> Google's Guava libraries include an optimized implementation of lexicographic
> byte comparison based on sun.misc.Unsafe that's ~4x faster than the normal
> Java implementation.
> http://hiroshiyamauchi.blogspot.com/2010/08/fast-unsigned-byte-lexicographical.html
> http://www.google.com/codesearch#UKMs0lhE9bg/trunk/src/com/google/common/primitives/UnsignedBytes.java&l=276
> We might similarly optimize BinaryData#compareBytes().
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira