[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14051597#comment-14051597
]
Martin Kleppmann commented on AVRO-695:
---------------------------------------
I don't mean to be grouchy, but I'm not convinced this is a feature that Avro
really needs to have. It adds complexity to all the language implementations of
Avro that need to support it, and it creates difficulties for anyone who needs
to map between Avro's data model and another data model (e.g. representing Avro
data in JSON format, or accessing Avro data in Pig through Pig's type system).
For an application that needs to model an arbitrary graph of references between
objects in Avro, I would argue that it's actually better for the object IDs to
be explicitly visible in the data model, rather than being automatically
resolved and thus hidden.
If there's some really awesome use case for circular references that I'm
missing, I'm open to being convinced. But I don't currently see it.
> Cycle Reference Support
> -----------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-695
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-695
> Project: Avro
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: spec
> Affects Versions: 1.7.6
> Reporter: Moustapha Cherri
> Attachments: avro-1.4.1-cycle.patch.gz, avro-1.4.1-cycle.patch.gz,
> avro_circular_references.zip, avro_circular_refs_2014_06_14.zip,
> circular_refs_and_nonstring_map_keys_2014_06_25.zip
>
> Original Estimate: 672h
> Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> This is a proposed implementation to add cycle reference support to Avro. It
> basically introduce a new type named Cycle. Cycles contains a string
> representing the path to the other reference.
> For example if we have an object of type Message that have a member named
> previous with type Message too. If we have have this hierarchy:
> message
> previous : message2
> message2
> previous : message2
> When serializing the cycle path for "message2.previous" will be "previous".
> The implementation depend on ANTLR to evaluate those cycle at read time to
> resolve them. I used ANTLR 3.2. This dependency is not mandated; I just used
> ANTLR to speed thing up. I kept in this implementation the generated code
> from ANTLR though this should not be the case as this should be generated
> during the build. I only updated the Java code.
> I did not make full unit testing but you can find "avrotest.Main" class that
> can be used a preliminary test.
> Please do not hesitate to contact me for further clarification if this seems
> interresting.
> Best regards,
> Moustapha Cherri
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
