[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15894042#comment-15894042
 ] 

Elliot West edited comment on AVRO-2003 at 3/3/17 11:06 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------

-[~satish.duggana], should I fork {{epkanol/avro-1:AVRO-1933}} and create a PR 
to merge back into there, or fork {{apache/avro:master}} and pull the AVRO-1933 
changes into there to create a single über PR?-

PR is located here: [https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/201]


was (Author: teabot):
[~satish.duggana], should I fork {{epkanol/avro-1:AVRO-1933}} and create a PR 
to merge back into there, or fork {{apache/avro:master}} and pull the AVRO-1933 
changes into there to create a single über PR?

> Report specific location of schema incompatibilities
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AVRO-2003
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2003
>             Project: Avro
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: java
>    Affects Versions: 1.8.1
>         Environment: Any java env
>            Reporter: Elliot West
>            Assignee: Elliot West
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.9.0
>
>         Attachments: AVRO-2003.patch
>
>
> h2. Overview
> Building on the work to improve schema incompatibility reporting in 
> AVRO-1933, it would be useful if the {{SchemaCompatibility}} classes could 
> also report the location in the schema where any incompatibility was 
> encountered.
> It is recommended that the location reported is both easily readable by 
> humans and machines. In the first case this would assist schema developers to 
> pin-point issues in there schema documents, and in the latter case it 
> provides a useful mechanism to schema tooling, such as IDEs and editors, to 
> easily select the pertinent nodes in the Schema document tree.
> h2. Implementation specifics
> To meet this requirements it is suggested that the location is encoded using 
> the [JSON Pointer specification|https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6901]. This is 
> both easily parsed by users, but is also supported by a number of libraries 
> for a range of common programming languages and platforms.
> h2. Examples
> Given the following example schema, consider some incompatibility scenarios. 
> For each case an expected JSON Pointer description of the incompatibility 
> location is described:
> {code}
> {
>   "type": "record",
>   "name": "myRecord",
>   "fields" : [
>     {"name": "pField", "type": "long"},
>     {"name": "uField", "type":
>       ["null", "int", "string"]
>     },
>     {"name": "eField", "type": 
>       { "type": "enum", "name": "Suit", "symbols" : ["SPADES", "HEARTS", 
> "DIAMONDS", "CLUBS"] }
>     },
>     {"name": "aField", "type":
>       {"type": "array", "items": "string"}
>     },
>     {"name": "mField", "type": 
>       {"type": "map", "values": "long"}
>     },
>     {"name": "fField", "type": 
>       {"type": "fixed", "size": 16, "name": "md5"}
>     }
>   ]
> }
> {code}
> Possible incompatibility scenarions and the location that would be reported 
> back to the user/tool: 
> * Root type incompatibility; report location: {{/}}
> * Record name mismatch; report location: {{/name}}
> * {{pField}} type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/0/type}}
> * {{uField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/1/type}}
> * {{uField}} missing union branch {{string}}; report location: 
> {{/fields/1/type/2}}
> * {{eField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/2/type}}
> * {{eField}} missing enum symbol; report location: {{/fields/2/type/symbols}}
> * {{eField}} enum name mismatch; report location: {{/fields/2/type/name}}
> * {{aField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/3/type}}
> * {{aField}} array element type incompatibility; report location: 
> {{/fields/3/type/items}}
> * {{mField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/4/type}}
> * {{mField}} map value type incompatibility; report location: 
> {{/fields/4/type/values}}
> * {{fField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/5/type}}
> * {{fField}} fixed name mismatch; report location: {{/fields/5/type/name}}
> * {{fField}} fixed size type incompatibility; report location: 
> {{/fields/5/type/size}}
> * {{fField}} missing default value; report location: {{/fields/5}}
> h2. Notes
> * This ticket depends on AVRO-1933 and associated patches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to