[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15894042#comment-15894042 ]
Elliot West edited comment on AVRO-2003 at 3/3/17 11:06 AM: ------------------------------------------------------------ -[~satish.duggana], should I fork {{epkanol/avro-1:AVRO-1933}} and create a PR to merge back into there, or fork {{apache/avro:master}} and pull the AVRO-1933 changes into there to create a single über PR?- PR is located here: [https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/201] was (Author: teabot): [~satish.duggana], should I fork {{epkanol/avro-1:AVRO-1933}} and create a PR to merge back into there, or fork {{apache/avro:master}} and pull the AVRO-1933 changes into there to create a single über PR? > Report specific location of schema incompatibilities > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AVRO-2003 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2003 > Project: Avro > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: java > Affects Versions: 1.8.1 > Environment: Any java env > Reporter: Elliot West > Assignee: Elliot West > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.9.0 > > Attachments: AVRO-2003.patch > > > h2. Overview > Building on the work to improve schema incompatibility reporting in > AVRO-1933, it would be useful if the {{SchemaCompatibility}} classes could > also report the location in the schema where any incompatibility was > encountered. > It is recommended that the location reported is both easily readable by > humans and machines. In the first case this would assist schema developers to > pin-point issues in there schema documents, and in the latter case it > provides a useful mechanism to schema tooling, such as IDEs and editors, to > easily select the pertinent nodes in the Schema document tree. > h2. Implementation specifics > To meet this requirements it is suggested that the location is encoded using > the [JSON Pointer specification|https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6901]. This is > both easily parsed by users, but is also supported by a number of libraries > for a range of common programming languages and platforms. > h2. Examples > Given the following example schema, consider some incompatibility scenarios. > For each case an expected JSON Pointer description of the incompatibility > location is described: > {code} > { > "type": "record", > "name": "myRecord", > "fields" : [ > {"name": "pField", "type": "long"}, > {"name": "uField", "type": > ["null", "int", "string"] > }, > {"name": "eField", "type": > { "type": "enum", "name": "Suit", "symbols" : ["SPADES", "HEARTS", > "DIAMONDS", "CLUBS"] } > }, > {"name": "aField", "type": > {"type": "array", "items": "string"} > }, > {"name": "mField", "type": > {"type": "map", "values": "long"} > }, > {"name": "fField", "type": > {"type": "fixed", "size": 16, "name": "md5"} > } > ] > } > {code} > Possible incompatibility scenarions and the location that would be reported > back to the user/tool: > * Root type incompatibility; report location: {{/}} > * Record name mismatch; report location: {{/name}} > * {{pField}} type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/0/type}} > * {{uField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/1/type}} > * {{uField}} missing union branch {{string}}; report location: > {{/fields/1/type/2}} > * {{eField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/2/type}} > * {{eField}} missing enum symbol; report location: {{/fields/2/type/symbols}} > * {{eField}} enum name mismatch; report location: {{/fields/2/type/name}} > * {{aField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/3/type}} > * {{aField}} array element type incompatibility; report location: > {{/fields/3/type/items}} > * {{mField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/4/type}} > * {{mField}} map value type incompatibility; report location: > {{/fields/4/type/values}} > * {{fField}} field type incompatibility; report location: {{/fields/5/type}} > * {{fField}} fixed name mismatch; report location: {{/fields/5/type/name}} > * {{fField}} fixed size type incompatibility; report location: > {{/fields/5/type/size}} > * {{fField}} missing default value; report location: {{/fields/5}} > h2. Notes > * This ticket depends on AVRO-1933 and associated patches. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)