[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2633?focusedWorklogId=660841&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-660841
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on AVRO-2633:
----------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 06/Oct/21 10:48
Start Date: 06/Oct/21 10:48
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: RyanSkraba merged pull request #1070:
URL: https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/1070
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 660841)
Remaining Estimate: 0h
Time Spent: 10m
> C# - AvroGen tool - Document for record type is not included in the Schema
> field
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AVRO-2633
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-2633
> Project: Apache Avro
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: csharp
> Affects Versions: 1.9.1
> Reporter: Minh Nguyen
> Assignee: Tom Irvine
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.11.0
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1) MyRecord.asvc file :
>
> {code:java}
> {
> "type" : "record",
> "doc" : "Doc for record"
> "name" : "MyRecord",
> "namespace" : "My.Namespace",
> "fields" :
> [
> { "name" : "Field1", "type" : "int" }
> ]
> }
> {code}
> 2) Run command to generate C# class from the Avro spec file:
> avrogen -s MyRecord.asvc ./
> -> Current behavior: the Schema field in C# class is missing the "doc" data,
> I got serialization error when tried to use this class because the subject in
> Schema Registry contains the "doc" field (I register the avro spec file to
> the schema registry seperately)
> {code:java}
> public partial class MyRecord : ISpecificRecord
> {
> public static Schema _SCHEMA =
> Schema.Parse("{\"type\":\"record\",\"name\":\"MyRecord\",\"namespace\":\"My.Namespace\",\"fields\":[{\"name\":\""
> + "Field1\",\"type\":\"int\"}]}");
> {code}
> -> Expected behavior: we should have the "doc" field for type "record", so it
> will be consistent with the spec file
> {code:java}
> public partial class MyRecord : ISpecificRecord
> {
> public static Schema _SCHEMA =
> Schema.Parse("{\"type\":\"record\", \"doc\":\"Doc for record\",
> \"name\":\"MyRecord\", \"namespace\":\"My.Namespace\",
> \"fields\":[{\"name\":\"" + "Field1\",\"type\":\"int\"}]}");
> {code}
> As a work around, right now I have to remove the "doc" for the type "record"
> but I think we should have it there and not causing a problem.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
