On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Mridul Muralidharan <mri...@gmail.com> wrote: > That would also depend on whether it is possible to move out of o.a.s > namespace - given the private[spark], etc restriction that scala > imposes. > I think Steve did allude to this in his mail.
I think that should be a (reasonably) short-term goal; that would help with making extensions compatible with multiple Spark releases, something that would be harder if they depend on private-ish APIs.
