Github user ScrapCodes commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/bahir/pull/13#discussion_r73649853
  
    --- Diff: 
sql-streaming-mqtt/src/main/scala/org/apache/bahir/sql/streaming/mqtt/MQTTStreamSource.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.bahir.sql.streaming.mqtt
    +
    +import java.sql.Timestamp
    +import java.text.SimpleDateFormat
    +import java.util.Calendar
    +import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch
    +
    +import scala.collection.concurrent.TrieMap
    +import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
    +import scala.util.{Failure, Success, Try}
    +
    +import org.apache.bahir.utils.Logging
    +import org.eclipse.paho.client.mqttv3._
    +import org.eclipse.paho.client.mqttv3.persist.{MemoryPersistence, 
MqttDefaultFilePersistence}
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.{DataFrame, SQLContext}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.execution.streaming.{LongOffset, Offset, 
Source}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.sources.{DataSourceRegister, 
StreamSourceProvider}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.types.{StringType, StructField, StructType, 
TimestampType}
    +
    +
    +object MQTTStreamConstants {
    +
    +  val DATE_FORMAT = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss")
    +
    +  val SCHEMA_DEFAULT = StructType(StructField("value", StringType)
    +    :: StructField("timestamp", TimestampType) :: Nil)
    +}
    +
    +class MQTTTextStreamSource(brokerUrl: String, persistence: 
MqttClientPersistence,
    +    topic: String, clientId: String, messageParser: Array[Byte] => 
(String, Timestamp),
    +    sqlContext: SQLContext) extends Source with Logging {
    +
    +  override def schema: StructType = MQTTStreamConstants.SCHEMA_DEFAULT
    +
    +  private val store = new LocalMessageStore(persistence, 
sqlContext.sparkContext.getConf)
    +
    +  private val messages = new TrieMap[Int, (String, Timestamp)]
    +
    +  private val initLock = new CountDownLatch(1)
    +
    +  private var offset = 0
    +
    +  private var client: MqttClient = _
    +
    +  private def fetchLastProcessedOffset(): Int = {
    +    Try(store.maxProcessedOffset) match {
    +      case Success(x) =>
    +        log.info(s"Recovering from last stored offset $x")
    +        x
    +      case Failure(e) => 0
    +    }
    +  }
    +
    +  initialize()
    +  private def initialize(): Unit = {
    +
    +    client = new MqttClient(brokerUrl, clientId, persistence)
    +    val mqttConnectOptions: MqttConnectOptions = new MqttConnectOptions()
    +    mqttConnectOptions.setAutomaticReconnect(true)
    +    // This is required to support recovery. TODO: configurable ?
    +    mqttConnectOptions.setCleanSession(false)
    +
    +    val callback = new MqttCallbackExtended() {
    +
    +      override def messageArrived(topic_ : String, message: MqttMessage): 
Unit = synchronized {
    --- End diff --
    
    No, definitely not for all QOS levels. In case of a failure to return from 
this method, a message may be redelivered.
    In case of a sudden crash, we may anyway lose messages. What do you think 
should be our strategy here ?
    
    About message ordering,
     According to this 
[post](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30955110/is-message-order-preserved), 
message ordering can be  ensured at the server end. Should we implement it at 
client end ? And do you think message id can be used to ensure ordering ?
    



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to