Sounds good. Looking forward to the next RC.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Christian R Kadner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ted, > > we decided to ignore the test that failed sporadically when we tested the > RC in December (BAHIR-83). > > So we should be good to give it a second attempt. > > Best regards, > Christian Kadner > > [image: Inactive hide details for Ted Yu ---01/10/2017 08:58:06 AM---Is it > a proper time to start preparing the next RC ? Cheers]Ted Yu > ---01/10/2017 08:58:06 AM---Is it a proper time to start preparing the next > RC ? Cheers > > From: Ted Yu <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 01/10/2017 08:58 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1) > ------------------------------ > > > > Is it a proper time to start preparing the next RC ? > > Cheers > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache > > Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2. > > > > The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at > > > > > https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1 > > > > > The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1 > > (1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90) > > > > https://github.com/apache/bahi > > r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90 > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007 > > > > The source distribution is also available at: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/ > > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1 > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > >
