If it is a known issue which is yet to be fixed (and not a regression), then it is fine - since we had it earlier as well I guess. Given that, I am +1 on release; though it would be nice to get it resolved given the mismatch in release artifacts.
Thanks, Mridul On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > I suggest getting BAHIR-88 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-88> fixed > - this may affect future release(s). > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The issue reported was for Spark extensions >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-88 >> >> >> And I guess it is also applicable for Flink extensions >> >> >> But the issue is still open. >> >> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Mridul Muralidharan < >> mridul...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Luciano, >> > >> > I would not consider them blocking - but I wanted clarity about >> > them, since I had seen jira's to the effect that they were fixed ? >> > Not sure if I am misremembering ! >> > >> > Regards, >> > Mridul >> > >> > >> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Mridul Muralidharan < >> > mridul...@apache.org> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi, >> > >> >> > >> From the release tag, clean build and tests work fine, signatures >> > match. >> > >> >> > >> The source at https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >> > dist/dev/bahir/bahir-flink/1. >> > >> 0-rc5/ >> > >> has additional files which are not in repo: >> > >> >> > >> Not in repo ./distribution/pom.xml.releaseBackup >> > >> Not in repo ./flink-connector-activemq/pom.xml.releaseBackup >> > >> Not in repo ./flink-connector-akka/pom.xml.releaseBackup >> > >> Not in repo ./flink-connector-flume/pom.xml.releaseBackup >> > >> Not in repo ./flink-connector-netty/pom.xml.releaseBackup >> > >> Not in repo ./flink-connector-redis/pom.xml.releaseBackup >> > >> Not in repo ./pom.xml.releaseBackup >> > >> Not in repo ./release.properties >> > >> >> > >> I thought this was fixed, but I could be remembering wrong ? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > That's what I thought as well, but it might have been for the Spark >> > > release. >> > > >> > > Are you considering this blocking ? Or would it be ok to continue with >> > the >> > > approval of the release ? >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Luciano Resende >> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>
