I think 1.0 makes the most sense. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017, 10:57 AM Davor Bonaci <[email protected]> wrote:
> The first stable release is our next major project-wide goal; see > discussion in [1]. I've been referring to it as "the first stable release" > for a long time, not "1.0.0" or "2.0.0" or "2017" or something else, to > make sure we have an unbiased discussion and a consensus-based decision on > this matter. > > I think that now is the time to consider the appropriate designation for > our first stable release, and formally make a decision on it. A reasonable > choices could be "1.0.0" or "2.0.0", perhaps there are others. > > 1.0.0: > * It logically comes after the current series, 0.x.y. > * Most people would expect it, I suppose. > * A possible confusion between Dataflow SDKs and Beam SDKs carrying the > same number. > > 2.0.0: > * Follows the pattern some other projects have taken -- continuing their > version numbering scheme from their previous origin. > * Better communicates project's roots, and degree of maturity. > * May be unexpected to some users. > > I'd invite everyone to share their thoughts and preferences -- names are > important and well correlated with success. Thanks! > > Davor > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c35067071aec9029d9100ae973c629 > 9aa919c31d0de623ac367128e2@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >
