Hi

Agree with Aviem and yes actually I'm working on a generic metric sink. I 
created a Jira about that. I'm off today, I will send some details asap.

Regards
JB

On Jun 22, 2017, 15:16, at 15:16, Aviem Zur <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi Cody,
>
>Some of the runners have their own metrics sink, for example Spark
>runner
>uses Spark's metrics sink which you can configure to send the metrics
>to
>backends such as Graphite.
>
>There have been ideas floating around for a Beam metrics sink extension
>which will allow users to send Beam metrics to various metrics
>backends, I
>believe @JB is working on something along these lines.
>
>On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 2:00 PM Cody Innowhere <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>> Currently metrics are implemented in runners/core as CounterCell,
>> GaugeCell, DistributionCell, etc. If we want to send metrics to
>external
>> systems via metrics reporter, we would have to define another set of
>> metrics, say, codahale metrics, and update codahale metrics
>periodically
>> with beam sdk metrics, which is inconvenient and inefficient.
>>
>> Another problem is that Meter/Histogram cannot be updated directly in
>this
>> way because their internal data decays after time.
>>
>> My opinion would be bridge beam sdk metrics to underlying runners so
>that
>> updates would directly apply to underlying runners (Flink, Spark,
>etc)
>> without conversion.
>>
>> Specifically, currently we already delegate
>> Metrics.counter/gauge/distribution to
>DelegatingCounter/Gauge/Distribution,
>> which uses MetricsContainer to store the actual metrics with the
>> implementation of MetricsContainerImpl. If we can add an API in
>> MetricsEnvironment to allow runners to override the default
>implementation,
>> say, for flink, we have FlinkMetricsContainerImpl, then all metric
>updates
>> will directly apply to metrics in FlinkMetricsContainerImpl without
>> intermediate conversion and updates. And since the metrics are
>> runner-specific, it would be a lot easier to support metrics
>reporters as
>> well as Meters/Histograms.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>

Reply via email to