At least three of these votes are from PMC members, so I'll let them know that this proposal is adopted.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Chamikara Jayalath < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > Cham > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:42 AM Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > -------- Original message --------From: Henning Rohde > > <[email protected]> Date: 11/1/17 9:29 AM (GMT-08:00) To: > > [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Switch to new JIRA workflow for > > pending proposals > > + 1. Also +1 to Kenn's suggestion of adding a "triage" stage prior to > > "open" for other bugs and features. > > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Kenneth Knowles <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 I like it. > > > > > > > > This is the JIRA alternative to FLIP/KIP/HIP etc, yes? I definitely > > favor > > > > having automation around that rather than just wiki or web page > > entries. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts on how it interacts with other types of tasks? > > > > > > > > Also, an analogous initial state seems useful for all bugs & > features. > > > > Namely, a "needs triage" state prior to "open". > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > It sounds like a good workflow to track the state of > ideas/proposals. > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > JB > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 1, 2017, 05:43, at 05:43, Reuven Lax > <[email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >There is a new JIRA workflow for tracking pending proposals. This > > > > > >workflow > > > > > >is described in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12698 > . > > > > > >Please > > > > > >vote on whether you believe Beam should adopt this new workflow. > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > >Reuven > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
