+1
Tested 2.2.0-RC3 using nexmark test suite
-in batch mode on: direct, spark, flink runners
-in streaming mode on: direct, flink runners
some features like state and timers are not supported yet on some
runners hence the combination not tested.
Best,
Etienne
Le 06/11/2017 à 06:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit :
Thanks for the update.
Sorry, I wasn't available yesterday night.
Let me take a look on the staged files.
Regards
JB
On 11/05/2017 11:30 PM, Reuven Lax wrote:
Built RC3, however many of these files/directories ended up in the
source
zip again, despite my being careful to run a git clean -x -f this
time. I'm
not sure why, taking a look.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> wrote:
Last time is the charm - it succeeded this time!
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> wrote:
BTW, I'm trying one more time.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> wrote:
yes, release:prepare worked fine.
If you're able to do so, that would be great. I don't know the
details
well enough to try and manually upload the artifacts.
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
<j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
I guess that release:prepare step worked fine. So the tag is there.
I can checkout on the tag and upload the artifacts on staging
repo (as
release:perform does).
Regards
JB
On 11/05/2017 08:59 PM, Reuven Lax wrote:
How would I go about doing this? Are there instructions on the
release
guide?
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
<j...@nanthrax.net
wrote:
It sounds like an issue on Nexus at Apache.
I just checked on status.apache.org and nothing special about
Nexus.
Do you want to try to upload artifacts (and then you can take hand
using
the staging repo) ?
Regards
JB
On 11/05/2017 08:53 PM, Reuven Lax wrote:
Unfortunately all attempts to cut RC03 now fail with
[*INFO*] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-deploy-plugin:2.8.2:deploy
(default-deploy)
on project beam-examples-java: Failed to deploy artifacts:
Could not
transfer artifact org.apache.beam:beam-examples-
java:jar.asc:javadoc:2.2.0
from/to apache.releases.https (
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/staging/deploy/maven2):
Connect
to repository.apache.org:443
[repository.apache.org/207.244.88.140]
failed:
Operation timed out (Connection timed out) -> [Help 1]
I've tried a few times.
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
I think it's wise, yes.
Regards
JB
On 11/05/2017 02:13 AM, Reuven Lax wrote:
Trying to perform surgery on the source dist looks a bit too
error
prone,
so I think I'll cut an RC3.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
Yeah, at least the script can ask for human validation at some
points of
the process (as we do in the release guide).
Regards
JB
On Nov 3, 2017, 18:22, at 18:22, Reuven Lax
<re...@google.com.INVALID>
wrote:
Of course. I don't think we can remove the release manager
from
the
process, but I think I can automate it so that there are
at least
fewer
manual steps for the release manager to perform.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
j...@nanthrax.net
wrote:
Got it. But don't forget there is a release guide and some
manual
validation to perform. A Apache release is not just a
script to
run,
as a
release manager, you are also responsible of the verification
(legal,
artifacts, etc).
Regards
JB
On Nov 3, 2017, 17:45, at 17:45, Reuven Lax
<re...@google.com.INVALID>
wrote:
What I meant is that there are many manual commands
today, which
makes
the
process more prone to human error at a number of points.
I don't
think
we
need to change the release process, I simply want to
script it
so
that
the
release owner has to run fewer commands.
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
<j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
Hi
If the tag is ok, updated artifacts require a new staging
repository.
So
it means the vote email is obsolete.
I would cut a clean new rc3 and start a new vote.
Regards
JB
On Nov 3, 2017, 16:30, at 16:30, Reuven Lax
<re...@google.com.INVALID>
wrote:
Thanks for catching this.
Do we need new artifacts? Looks like we might just
need a new
source
drop.
On Nov 3, 2017 11:27 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <
j...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
Probably the cleanup (git clean -x) has not be done
before
cutting
the
release.
I would ask a new rc to fix the provided artifacts.
Regards
JB
On Nov 3, 2017, 15:46, at 15:46, "Ismaël Mejía"
<ieme...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I found some issues during the vote validation (not
sure if
those
would require a new vote since most seem to be packaging
related
and
we can get with it by removing the extra stuff that
ended up
in
the
zip files):
1. I inspected the
apache-beam-2.2.0-source-release.zip file
and
was
a
bit surprised to notice that it was twice the size of
the one
for
the
2.1.0 vote, then I discovered that the sdks/python/,eggs
directory
was
part of the 2.2.0 zip file (I suppose this is an issue).
2. There are some directories/files that appear in
the zip
file
that
don't exist in the 2.2.0-rc2 git tag:
2.1.1/
foo/
model/
sdks/python/README.md
3. Then I run the rat validation and it broke
because some
files
don't
have the correct (I suppose these are generated files that
should
not
be part of the final distribution). This is a part of the
release
process that we have done manually and that has bitten
us in
the
latest two releases.
[WARNING] Files with unapproved licenses:
sdks/python/apache_beam/portab
ility/api/beam_runner_api_pb2_
grpc.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/standard_window_fns_
pb2.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portab
ility/api/beam_job_api_pb2.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/endpoints_pb2.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/beam_artifact_api_
pb2_grpc.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/beam_artifact_api_pb
2.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/beam_fn_api_pb2_grpc
.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portab
ility/api/beam_fn_api_pb2.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/beam_runner_api_pb2.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/beam_provision_api_p
b2.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/beam_job_api_pb2_grp
c.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/endpoints_pb2_grpc.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portab
ility/api/beam_provision_api_
pb2_grpc.py
sdks/python/apache_beam/portability/api/standard_
window_fns_pb2_grpc.py
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Reuven Lax
<re...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #2
for the
version
2.2.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please
provide
specific
comments)
The complete staging area is available for your
review,
which
includes:
* JIRA release notes [1],
* the official Apache source release to be deployed
to
dist.apache.org
[2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
B98B7708
[3],
* all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven
Central
Repository
[4],
* source code tag "v2.2.0-RC2" [5],
* website pull request listing the release and
publishing
the
API
reference manual [6].
* Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.5.0 and
OpenJDK/Oracle
JDK
1.8.0_144.
* Python artifacts are deployed along with the
source
release
to
the
dist.apache.org [2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is
adopted
by
majority
approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
Thanks,
Reuven
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
projectId=12319527&version=12341044
[2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.2.0/
[3]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
[4]
https://repository.apache.org/
content/repositories/orgapache
beam-1022/
[5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.2.0-RC2
[6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/337
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
