We updated Step #2 in our proposal. Comments and suggestions are highly appreciated.
Thanks 2017-10-31 15:42 GMT+01:00 Łukasz Gajowy <lukasz.gaj...@gmail.com>: > We edited the "Roadmap" section a little bit to reflect our state of > knowledge. As before, all comments are welcome. > > Thank you in advance! > > 2017-10-27 5:10 GMT+02:00 Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com.invalid>: > > > I am really excited about this development. Glad to have such a detailed > > document! Thanks for taking the time to write it up thoughtfully. > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Chamikara Jayalath < > > chamik...@google.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Thanks Łukasz and the team for the proposal. I think fixing this JIRA > > will > > > allow us to keep track of the performance of widely used > > > source/sink/runner/file-system combinations of Beam SDK. As Łukasz > > > mentioned, all comments are welcome. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Cham > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 8:08 AM Łukasz Gajowy <lukasz.gaj...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello Beam Community! > > > > > > > > > > > > During the last year many of Beam developers has put much effort in > > > > developing and discussing means of testing beam transforms. We would > > like > > > > to benefit from that and implement performance tests for file-based > I/O > > > > Transforms. > > > > > > > > > > > > This proposal is strictly related to BEAM-3060 issue. Here’s the link > > to > > > > the doc: > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dA-5s6OHiP_cz- > > > NRAbwapoKF5MEC1wKps4A5tFbIPKE/edit > > > > > > > > > > > > All comments are deeply appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > ŁG > > > > > > > > > >
