+1 on having a release started in January and not holding on feature requests.
I'd like to learn more about the release process in order to automate parts of it. I'm not volunteering to do the release, but would like to pair with whomever is doing the release to discuss pain points and help in any way I can during the process. JB - be happy to pair with you over slack if you're willing. Alan On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> wrote: > +1 for starting the 2.3 ball rolling. > > In general, I'd like to avoid holding up releases for specific > features/PRs. The is (one of the things) that holds up releases which > then is a vicious cycle for more people wanting to make their feature > a condition of the next release, etc. (Bugs, regressions, and > backwards-incompatible refinements to new features are fair candidates > as the need arises...) > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > wrote: > > Hi Romain, > > > > no problem: let's try a best effort and define the target version in the > > Jira. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 01/08/2018 03:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> > >> Hi JB, > >> > >> I'd like https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/4235 to be integrated if > >> possible > >> > >> Also the JUnit 5 PR brings some light changes which can be worth the "3" > >> digit upgrade so if anyone has some time to review it can be a good > >> candidate too. > >> > >> Thanks for driving it > >> > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> > >> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> > >> > >> 2018-01-08 15:37 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > >> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>: > >> > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> In a previous discussion thread, we agreed that we should have a > >> regular > >> pace in term of releases. > >> > >> We released Beam 2.2.0 on the 16th of November '17, but the release > >> takes a > >> pretty long time. > >> > >> I think it's reasonable to think about Beam 2.3.0 in the coming > weeks. > >> I > >> would like to propose target Beam 2.3.0 for end January/beginning of > >> February. > >> > >> I'm volunteer to do this release. > >> > >> Thoughts ? > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > jbono...@apache.org > > http://blog.nanthrax.net > > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
