Agree ! That's why I would like to move forward for 2.4.0 on those ones.
Regards JB On 01/31/2018 02:44 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Thanks JB, this is great news since they are highly used IO in the industry > and > really awaited now. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> > > 2018-01-31 14:42 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net > <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>: > > By the way, short term: ParquetIO, RabbitMqIO are coming (PRs already > open). > > Regards > JB > > On 01/31/2018 02:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi Romain, > > > > I have some IOs locally and some idea: > > > > - ExecIO (it has been proposed as PR but declined) > > - ConsoleIO (generic) > > - SocketIO > > - RestIO > > - MinaIO > > > > I also created the other IOs Jira. > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On 01/31/2018 01:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> is there a plan for future IO and some tracking somewhere? > >> > >> I particularly wonder if there are plans for a HTTP IO and common > server > IO like > >> SFTP, SSH, etc... > >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | > Old Blog > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com>> > | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau > <https://github.com/rmannibucau>> | > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> > > > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com