Hi Reuven,

it's what I'm suspecting. git bisect should give us more information (still in
progress, 3 more steps to complete ;)). I keep you posted.

Regards
JB

On 02/06/2018 08:36 AM, Reuven Lax wrote:
> Could this be related to any of the portability changes?
> 
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Created:
> 
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3617
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3617>
> 
>     Regards
>     JB
> 
>     On 02/05/2018 04:42 PM, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
>     > What is the Jira for direct runner perf?
>     >
>     > On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:35 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Thanks !
>     >
>     >     I cherry-pick on release-2.3.0 branch.
>     >
>     >     I'm on the direct runner perf test in the mean time.
>     >
>     >     Thanks again !
>     >
>     >     Regards
>     >     JB
>     >
>     >     On 02/05/2018 12:06 PM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>     >     > I merged fixes for:
>     >     >  - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3186
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3186>
>     >     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3186
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3186>>
>     >     >  - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3589
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3589>
>     >     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3589
>     <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-3589>>
>     >     >
>     >     > @JB I didn't yet merge them on the 2.3.0 branch, though, but I 
> can or you can go
>     >     > ahead.
>     >     >
>     >     >> On 5. Feb 2018, at 06:30, Jean-Baptiste Onofré 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Hi guys,
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Quick update on the RC2 preparation:
>     >     >>
>     >     >> * BEAM-3587 (TextIO with Flink) seems related to a custom build 
> with
>     >     Gradle (not
>     >     >> using artifacts created by Maven). Anyway, I will take a look 
> today.
>     >     >> * BEAM-3186 has a PR. Aljoscha will do the review pretty soon.
>     >     >> * I'm also taking a look on the direct runner performance change.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> The goal is to cut RC2 tomorrow or the day after.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Regards
>     >     >> JB
>     >     >>
>     >     >> On 02/01/2018 04:16 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>     >     >>> Hi guys,
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> Especially due to BEAM-3587 & BEAM-3186 regressions, I cancel 
> RC1.
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> We will cherry-pick fixes on release-2.3.0 branch.
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> I'm updating Jira right now. When the fixes will be 
> cherry-picked, I
>     >     will submit
>     >     >>> a RC2 to vote.
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> Thanks !
>     >     >>> Regards
>     >     >>> JB
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> On 01/30/2018 09:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>     >     >>>> Hi everyone,
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the 
> version
>     >     2.3.0, as
>     >     >>>> follows:
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>     >     >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific 
> comments)
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>     includes:
>     >     >>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>     >     >>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>     dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>     >     <http://dist.apache.org>
>     >     >>>> <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>     >     >>>> which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>     >     >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository 
> [4],
>     >     >>>> * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC1" [5],
>     >     >>>> * website pull request listing the release and publishing the 
> API
>     reference
>     >     >>>> manual [6].
>     >     >>>> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK
>     1.8.0_111.
>     >     >>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release 
> to the
>     >     >>>> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org> 
> <http://dist.apache.org>
>     <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by 
> majority approval,
>     >     >>>> with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>> Thanks,
>     >     >>>> JB
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>> [1]
>     >     >>>> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>     
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>     >     
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>     
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>>
>     >     >>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>     >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>>
>     >     >>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>     >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>>
>     >     >>>> [4] 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/
>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/>
>     >     
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/
>     <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1026/>>
>     >     >>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>
>     >     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC1>>
>     >     >>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>     >     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>>
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> --
>     >     >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>     >     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >     >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>     >     >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     --
>     >     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>     >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>     >     Talend - http://www.talend.com
>     >
>     >
> 
>     --
>     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>     Talend - http://www.talend.com
> 
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to