Great !!!

Thanks for the update, I will close the vote then.

Regards
JB

On 02/15/2018 11:45 PM, Ben Sidhom wrote:
> I just successfully ran the quickstart on Flink 1.4.0 on Dataproc. Should be
> good to go.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:21 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net
> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> wrote:
> 
>     Luke said he tested Flink locally. So, we have to test on a Yarn cluster.
> 
>     Regards
>     JB
> 
>     On 02/15/2018 06:16 PM, Reuven Lax wrote:
>     > I count enough votes :) So sounds like someone needs to verify Flink 1.4
>     > quickstart, and then we're ready?
>     >
>     > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com
>     <mailto:rober...@google.com>
>     > <mailto:rober...@google.com <mailto:rober...@google.com>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     +1 (binding) pending Flink verification. I have checked the 
> signatures
>     >     and checksums of the artifacts, and that it agrees with commit
>     >     67b5e1bab25d284cdac2127b47f44acc8e83499e on github *except* for 76
>     >     places where -SNAPSHOT was removed.
>     >
>     >     FWIW, http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution
>     >     <http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution> now recommends
>     >     sha512 (over sha1 which has been broken).
>     >
>     >     On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:24 PM, Eugene Kirpichov
>     <kirpic...@google.com <mailto:kirpic...@google.com>
>     >     <mailto:kirpic...@google.com <mailto:kirpic...@google.com>>> wrote:
>     >     > Thanks Kenn. I retract my -1, but then someone must verify it 
> with Flink
>     >     > 1.4. I might give it a shot tomorrow (installing Flink 1.4 on 
> Dataproc).
>     >     >
>     >     > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 4:53 PM Reuven Lax <re...@google.com
>     <mailto:re...@google.com>
>     >     <mailto:re...@google.com <mailto:re...@google.com>>> wrote:
>     >     >>
>     >     >> +1 (binding)
>     >     >>
>     >     >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Alan Myrvold 
> <amyrv...@google.com
>     <mailto:amyrv...@google.com>
>     >     <mailto:amyrv...@google.com <mailto:amyrv...@google.com>>>
>     >     >> wrote:
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> +1 Validated java quickstarts for direct, dataflow, apex, 
> flink, and
>     >     >>> spark.
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com
>     <mailto:lc...@google.com>
>     >     <mailto:lc...@google.com <mailto:lc...@google.com>>> wrote:
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>> +1 (binding)
>     >     >>>> Validated several quickstarts including the regression that I
>     originally
>     >     >>>> reported with Spark.
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:34 AM, Ismaël Mejía 
> <ieme...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>
>     >     <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com <mailto:ieme...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>     >     >>>>>
>     >     >>>>> +1 (binding)
>     >     >>>>>
>     >     >>>>> Validated SHAs + tag vs source.zip file.
>     >     >>>>> Run mvn clean install -Prelease OK
>     >     >>>>> Validated that the 3 regressions reported for RC1 were fixed.
>     >     >>>>> Run Nexmark on Direct/Flink runner on local mode, no 
> regressions
>     now.
>     >     >>>>> Installed python version on virtualenv and run local 
> wordcount with
>     >     >>>>> success.
>     >     >>>>> Checked that the hadoop-input-format artifact is in the 
> extended
>     >     >>>>> staging area.
>     >     >>>>>
>     >     >>>>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:41 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>     <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>
>     >     <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>>>
>     >     >>>>> wrote:
>     >     >>>>> > +1 (binding)
>     >     >>>>> >
>     >     >>>>> > Tested the Spark runner (with wordcount example and beam 
> samples)
>     >     >>>>> > Tested the performance of the direct runner
>     >     >>>>> >
>     >     >>>>> > I just updated the spreadsheet.
>     >     >>>>> >
>     >     >>>>> > Regards
>     >     >>>>> > JB
>     >     >>>>> >
>     >     >>>>> > On 02/11/2018 06:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>     >     >>>>> >> Hi everyone,
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >> Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the
>     version
>     >     >>>>> >> 2.3.0, as
>     >     >>>>> >> follows:
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>     >     >>>>> >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>     >     >>>>> >> comments)
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >> The complete staging area is available for your review, 
> which
>     >     >>>>> >> includes:
>     >     >>>>> >> * JIRA release notes [1],
>     >     >>>>> >> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>     >     >>>>> >> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>     <http://dist.apache.org> [2],
>     >     >>>>> >> which is signed with the key with fingerprint C8282E76 [3],
>     >     >>>>> >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>     Repository [4],
>     >     >>>>> >> * source code tag "v2.3.0-RC3" [5],
>     >     >>>>> >> * website pull request listing the release and publishing 
> the API
>     >     >>>>> >> reference
>     >     >>>>> >> manual [6].
>     >     >>>>> >> * Java artifacts were built with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK
>     >     >>>>> >> 1.8.0_111.
>     >     >>>>> >> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source 
> release
>     to the
>     >     >>>>> >> dist.apache.org <http://dist.apache.org>
>     <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted 
> by
>     >     >>>>> >> majority approval,
>     >     >>>>> >> with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >> Thanks,
>     >     >>>>> >> JB
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >> [1]
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >   
>      
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608
>     >   
>      
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12341608>
>     >     >>>>> >> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/
>     >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.3.0/>
>     >     >>>>> >> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>     >     <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS>
>     >     >>>>> >> [4]
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1028/
>     >     
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1028/>
>     >     >>>>> >> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC3
>     >     <https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.3.0-RC3>
>     >     >>>>> >> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381
>     >     <https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/381>
>     >     >>>>> >>
>     >     >>>>> >
>     >     >>>>> > --
>     >     >>>>> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>     >     >>>>> > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
>     <mailto:jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>>
>     >     >>>>> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
>     >     >>>>> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>>
>     >     >>>
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
> 
>     --
>     Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>     jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
>     http://blog.nanthrax.net
>     Talend - http://www.talend.com
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -Ben

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to