On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:25 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Eugene, > Thanks for putting this together, this is a very nice update and brings > much needed visibility to those hoping to make use of the portability > features or contribute to them. +1, this is a great summary. > Since the P1 (MVP) milestone is "wordcount" and some of the next things > listed are more contributor oriented, perhaps we can get more detailed on > what functionality users can expect? The way things are structured, once we can run wordcount, we'll be able to run almost all batch pipelines. > The next P2 milestone is basically everything and that is a lot. It might > actually help to break this down a bit more. A couple of things that I'm > specifically interested in for Python on Flink: > AFAIK state and timer support in Python are not being worked on yet, is > anyone planning to and any idea by when SDK and portable runner might > support it? IIRC, Luke's starting to investigate portable support for state (and timers). The Python SDK does not yet offer them yet; this work is ripe for someone to pick up. I'd be more than happy to talk to anyone about design here. (The Python SDK already has some notion of state in the side input implementation, but how exactly timers will be plumbed back is still a bit less clear.) > Session windows are supported in the Python SDK, but will they (and all other windowing features) work equally well on the portable Flink runner? We know that custom window functions will need work.. The "standard" known window fn URNs (global, fixed, sliding, and sessions) will work equally well on the portable Flink runner. WindowFns with URNs that are not built into the runner core (e.g. "PickledPythonWindowFn") are a bit harder, and there's still design work to do for how best to support merging in that case. Windowing also impacts side inputs, and this should "just work" as long as the runner can understand the window coder (currently we only have Global and IntervalWindows) and probably wouldn't be too hard to augment with length prefixing for arbitrary window types (given that the window mapping happens in the SDK). > BTW can you clarify the dependency between streaming support (which I'm working on) and SDF. It refers to new connectors? It's pretty straightforward to translate a bound source into an impulse, a DoFn that outputs splits, and then a DoFn that reads the splits, none of which requires the S part of SDF (until one wants to do liquid sharding of course). We'll actually need the full splittable protocol over the Fn API to wrap existing unbounded sources (optimistically hoping there's a clean map) as (a series of) SDFs or write new ones. - Robert > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <kirpic...@google.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> A little over a month ago, a large group of Beam community members has been working a prototype of a portable Flink runner - that is, a runner that can execute Beam pipelines on Flink via the Portability API. The prototype was developed in a separate branch and was successfully demonstrated at Flink Forward, where it ran Python and Go pipelines in a limited setting. >> Since then, a smaller group of people (Ankur Goenka, Axel Magnuson, Ben Sidhom and myself) have been working on productionizing the prototype to address its limitations and do things "the right way", preparing to reuse this work for developing other portable runners (e.g. Spark). This involves a surprising amount of work, since many important design and implementation concerns could be ignored for the purposes of a prototype. I wanted to give an update on where we stand now. >> Our immediate milestone in sight is Run Java and Python batch WordCount examples against a distributed remote Flink cluster. That involves a few moving parts, roughly in order of appearance: >> Job submission: >> - The SDK is configured to use a "portable runner", whose responsibility is to run the pipeline against a given JobService endpoint. >> - The portable runner converts the pipeline to a portable Pipeline proto >> - The runner finds out which artifacts it needs to stage, and staging them against an ArtifactStagingService >> - A Flink-specific JobService receives the Pipeline proto, performs some optimizations (e.g. fusion) and translates it to Flink datasets and functions >> Job execution: >> - A Flink function executes a fused chain of Beam transforms (an "executable stage") by converting the input and the stage to bundles and executing them against an SDK harness >> - The function starts the proper SDK harness, auxiliary services (e.g. artifact retrieval, side input handling) and wires them together >> - The function feeds the data to the harness and receives data back. >> And here is our status of implementation for these parts: basically, almost everything is either done or in review. >> Job submission: >> - General-purpose portable runner in the Python SDK: done; Java SDK: also done >> - Artifact staging from the Python SDK: in review (PR, PR); in java, it's done also >> - Flink JobService: in review >> - Translation from a Pipeline proto to Flink datasets and functions: done >> - ArtifactStagingService implementation that stages artifacts to a location on a distributed filesystem: in development (design is clear) >> Job execution: >> - Flink function for executing via an SDK harness: done >> - APIs for managing lifecycle of an SDK harness: done >> - Specific implementation of those APIs using Docker: part done, part in review >> - ArtifactRetrievalService that retrieves artifacts from the location where ArtifactStagingService staged them: in development. >> We expect that the in-review parts will be done, and the in-development parts be developed, in the next 2-3 weeks. We will, of course, update the community when this important milestone is reached. >> After that, the next milestones include: >> - Sett up Java, Python and Go ValidatesRunner tests to run against the portable Flink runner, and get them to pass >> - Expand Python and Go to parity in terms of such test coverage >> - Implement the portable Spark runner, with a similar lifecycle but reusing almost all of the Flink work >> - Add support for streaming to both (which requires SDF - that work is progressing in parallel and by this point should be in a suitable place) >> For people who would like to get involved in this effort: You can already help out by improving ValidatesRunner test coverage in Python and Go. Java has >300 such tests, Python has only a handful. There'll be a large amount of parallelizable work once we get the VR test suites running - stay tuned. SDF+Portability is also expected to produce a lot of parallelizable work up for grabs within several weeks. >> Thanks!
