+1 (non-binding) Fantastic to see another language being used in this space and the learnings that will come from bringing another language to the SDK.
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Willy Lulciuc <willy.lulc...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Great work! > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote: > >> The process has to be done by an officer or member. Can you help us with >> this, Davor? >> >> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:14 PM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:42 PM Davor Bonaci <da...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> >> * Robert mentioned that "SGA should have probably already been >>> filed" >>> in the previous thread. I got the impression that nothing further was >>> needed. I'll follow up. >>> >>> > Please just follow: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/. Simple. >>> Quick. >>> >>> +1, let's put this question behind us. >>> >>> > Perhaps relevant: I saw some golang license determinations as Category >>> A >>> fly by earlier in the week. Reuse/quote anything already available. >>> >>> >> * The standard Go tooling basically always pulls directly from >>> github, >>> so there is no real urgency here. >>> >>> > No urgency. That said, we'll probably want a copy of whatever GitHub is >>> serving, to be served also by dist.apache.org (and considered as the >>> source >>> of truth). >>> >>> Yes, we should continue mirroring $(wget >>> https://github.com/apache/beam/archive/release-${VERSION}.zip) there. >>> >> >
