+1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <amyrv...@google.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of 90) > to match the contribute policy. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@google.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate >> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and >> then close them after a 7 day grace period. >> >> For more details, see: >> >> - our stale PR policy [1] >> - the discussion thread [2] >> - Probot stale [3] >> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4] >> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5] >> - Example PR that would activate it [6] >> >> Please vote: >> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale >> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments) >> >> Kenn >> >> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests >> [2] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E >> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale >> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423 >> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589 >> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532 >> > -- ------- Jason Kuster Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
