Yes, I agree with that, I thought it was the delay to start the review. +1 then
on the delay to answer
Etienne
Le jeudi 07 juin 2018 à 11:02 +0100, Reuven Lax a écrit :
> However I think it's reasonable to expect a response within 3 days, even if
> that response is not an actual review. For
> instance, the response could be "I'm extremely busy right now, and it will
> take another week for me to get to this."
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018, 10:40 AM Etienne Chauchot <[email protected]> wrote:
> > +1 on the purpose, but I think 3 business days for proposal 1 are
> > over-optimistic. As an example I saw PRs taking
> > weeks before the review started. IMHO, I think you should consider raising
> > up the 3 days bar a bit.
> > BestEtienne
> > Le mardi 05 juin 2018 à 15:04 -0700, Andrew Pilloud a écrit :
> > > The one thing that seems a little odd to me is using business days. The
> > > beam community spans across company and
> > > country boundaries, which makes business days a slightly ambiguous
> > > concept. Not everyone's holidays and weekends
> > > line up. I also agree with Alan, we need to build in time to disconnect.
> > > If this is opt-in, it might make sense to
> > > collect working hours and make it easy to opt out if you aren't going to
> > > be available for an extended period.
> > > Until recently we had a page listing committer companies and time zones.
> > > Bringing that back would be a good
> > > option.
> > > Andrew
> > > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 2:29 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Thanks Ken for pointing out that vote is a two step process. I will
> > > > write an extended written doc about pros and
> > > > cons of the SLO and any related topics. In the meantime, feel free to
> > > > use this thread to express any suggestions
> > > > and concerns.
> > > > Thanks, Huygaa
