Hi Jason, yeah, it seems overall better.
Thanks ! Regards JB On 23/07/2018 18:33, Jason Kuster wrote: > Hi all, > > As an FYI: the Jenkins master got an upgrade to a much beefier machine > over the weekend. Per Infra (on bui...@apache.org > <mailto:bui...@apache.org>): > Jenkins has been migrated to a brand new > 48 core machine with 128GB RAM and 3.5TB of NVMe storage. Initial > testing looks good, and builds are proceeding as expected. We hope this > will provide a significant improvement in user experience on the > front-end, and increase the throughput of builds. > > Please note that > the 3.5TB of NVMe is less than what the previous jenkins master had. It > is critical that all projects aggressively trim their retained builds in > order for this shared resource to continue to function optimally. > Anecdotally, the Jenkins UI feels much faster to me at this point, which > is exciting! > If anyone sees issues with e.g. scripts, access, builds queueing, or > other Jenkins-related things please ping on this thread and we can put > together a set of escalations to Infra. > > As I recall we are not one of the projects causing problems with > retained builds (I think we generally keep artifacts for <1mo) but it's > worth noting the paragraph about storage space on Jenkins. If storage > constraints give Infra problems they may implement a global retention > window which would affect us at that point. > > Best, > > Jason > > -- > ------- > Jason Kuster > Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow > > See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
