+1 for a cleanup flag. If unclear to anyone, this is about the disk space, not about stopping containers after the run.

Containers should always be cleaned up unless the flag is specified.

-Max

On 04.10.18 01:28, Ankur Goenka wrote:
Seems reasonable. A pipeline option should suffice for this purpose.

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 3:02 PM Henning Rohde <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    IMO it's the runner's responsibility to do container garbage
    collection and disk space management. This flag seems like a
    implementation-specific option that would not only to some
    runner/deployment combinations, so it doesn't seem to belong in that
    proto. Dataflow would not be able to honor such a flag, for example.
    Perhaps Flink could start all containers with --rm and have a
    Flink-specific debug option to not do that?

    Henning

    On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:19 PM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Hi,

        In portable flink runner, SDK Harness docker containers are
        created dynamically and are not garbage collected. SDK Harness
        container pull the staging artifact, generate logs and tmp files
        which is stored as an additional layer on top of image.
        These dead container layers accumulates over time and make the
        machine go OOM. To avoid this situation and keep the flexibility
        of letting containers exist for debugging, I am planning to add
        cleanup flag to DockerPayload.
        When set, this flag will tell runner to remove the container
        after killing.
        Current DockerPayload:

        // The payload of a Docker image
        message DockerPayload {
           string container_image =1;// implicitly linux_amd64.
        }


        Proposed DockerPayload:

        // The payload of a Docker image
        message DockerPayload {
           string container_image =1;// implicitly linux_amd64.
        bool cleanup =2;// Flag to signal container deletion after killing.
        }


        Let me know your thoughts and if there is a better way to do this.

        Thanks,
        Ankur

Reply via email to