Agree, I think connector is a more meaning name for users. IO is more the Beam "internal" wording.
I will update this section as I have new connectors ( :) ) on the fly. Regards JB On 26/10/2018 04:49, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > My $0.02 > > "IO" has an established meaning in Beam dev argot but I think on the web > page I would use the word "connector" or something more universal. > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com > <mailto:chamik...@google.com>> wrote: > > > (1) Add a top level IO roadmap. > > > I like this, but it is important on the roadmap to be very clear about > language / SDK. > > > (2) Add IO roadmap sub-sections under each SDK instead of at top level. > > > This seems OK to me too. If you are a user and you have some data you > just want to see if it is going to be accessible to you soon. You > probably already committed to a language. > > > (3) We don't need a IO roadmap since we already have > https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/ > > > I think the roadmap / in-progress part should move to the new Roadmap > and/or the wiki. > > Kenn > > > > WDYT ? > > Thanks, > Cham > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: *Chamikara Jayalath* <notificati...@github.com > <mailto:notificati...@github.com>> > Date: Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:07 PM > Subject: Re: [apache/beam] [Website] Add roadmap at top level (#6718) > To: apache/beam <b...@noreply.github.com > <mailto:b...@noreply.github.com>> > Cc: Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com > <mailto:chamik...@google.com>>, Your activity > <your_activ...@noreply.github.com > <mailto:your_activ...@noreply.github.com>> > > > Ok. Makes sense. Kenn and others, WDYT ? We can start writing down a > roadmap for IO if there's no objection. It can include more details > about some of the proposed IO mentioned in > https://beam.apache.org/documentation/io/built-in/ as well as > information on upcoming major IO related efforts such as > cross-language IO support and SDF (in addition to what will be > available in portability roadmap for these features). > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/6718#issuecomment-433262537>, > or mute the thread > > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKUZEUcsbL6bhjOfeRiNZmqtab3PDWBjks5uom5KgaJpZM4Xj9s1>. >
