I was about to suggest tags in subject lines as well. Easier to see in email listings than anything in the body.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 7:22 PM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote: > Putting the tags in the subject line is inline with the style of what we > currently do using [DISCUSS], [VOTE], [BEAM-YYY] so I like that. (I forgot > that you can edit subject after the fact, thanks for pointing that out.) > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:04 AM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The traditional thing to do is something like [SQL] or [Portability] in >> the subject. Cannot be added after the email has been sent, but your email >> client can probably do that part, right? If another user changes the >> subject line to add more tags in their reply, I think things like gmail >> will actually keep the thread intact and it will show up in searches too. >> Lots of lightweight options that don't require us to invent anything. >> >> Kenn >> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 AM Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Kafka uses KIPs >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals >>> >>> Flink uses FLIPs >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals >>> >>> So Beam - BIPs ???? >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:48 PM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> [email protected] gets a lot of e-mail. I was wondering how other >>>> Apache projects help their contributors focus on design/project discussions >>>> (such as SQL, SplittableDoFn, Portability, Samza, Flink, Testing, ...)? >>>> >>>> I'm looking for a solution that allows people to tag a discussion with >>>> multiple topics, and that tags can be added after the e-mail has been sent >>>> as the discussion may cross multiple topics such as testing and SQL. >>>> >>>> I was initially thinking that we could embed tags like "topic:sql" in >>>> the message body and if something was part of multiple tags it would be >>>> "topic:sql topic:testing" to make it easy >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>
