+1,  Looking forward to the release!

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:09 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I ran Beam RC verification script [1] and updated the validation
> spreadsheet [2]. I think the current release candidate looks good.
>
> So +1 for the release.
>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/release/src/main/scripts/run_rc_validation.sh
> [2]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=2053422529
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 7:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <ieme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looking at the dates on the Spark runner git log there was a PR merged to
>> change Spark translation from classes to URNs. I cannot see how this can
>> impact performance. Looking at the other queries in the dashboards, there
>> seems to be a great variability in the executions of the Spark runner to
>> the point of feeling we don't have guarantees anymore. I wonder if this was
>> because of other loads shared in the server(s), or because our sample is
>> too small for the standard deviation.
>>
>> I would proceed with the release, the real question is if we can somehow
>> constraint the execution of this tests to have a more consistent output.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 4:10 PM Etienne Chauchot <echauc...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> Regarding query7 in spark:
>>> - there doesn't seem to be a functional regression: query passes and
>>> output size is still the same
>>>
>>> - Also the performance degradation seems to be only on spark, the other
>>> runners do not seem to suffer from it.
>>>
>>> - performance degradation seems to be constant from 11/12 so we can
>>> eliminate temporary load on the jenkins server that would generate delays
>>> in Max transform.
>>>
>>> => query7 uses Max transform, fanout and side inputs, has one of these
>>> parts recently (11/12/18) changed in spark?
>>>
>>> Etienne
>>>
>>> Le jeudi 06 décembre 2018 à 21:32 -0800, Chamikara Jayalath a écrit :
>>>
>>> Udi or anybody else who is familiar about Nexmark,  please -1 the vote
>>> thread if you think this particular performance regression for Spark/Direct
>>> runners is a blocker. Otherwise I think we can continue the vote.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cham
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:19 PM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Are either of these regressions due to known issues ? If not should they
>>> be considered release blockers ?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cham
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:11 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> For DirectRunner there are regressions in query 7 sql direct runner
>>> batch mode
>>> <https://apache-beam-testing.appspot.com/explore?dashboard=5084698770407424&widget=732741424&container=411089194>
>>>  (2x)
>>> and streaming mode (5x).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I see a regression for query 7 spark runner batch mode
>>> <https://apache-beam-testing.appspot.com/explore?dashboard=5138380291571712&widget=1782465104&container=462502368>
>>>  on
>>> about 2018-11-13.
>>> [image: image.png]
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 2:46 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version
>>> 2.9.0, as follows:
>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>>
>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes:
>>> * JIRA release notes [1],
>>> * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache.org
>>> [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint EEAC70DF3D0BC23B [3],
>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>> * source code tag "v2.9.0-RC1" [5],
>>> * website pull request listing the release [6] and publishing the API
>>> reference manual [7].
>>> * Python artifacts are deployed along with the source release to the
>>> dist.apache.org [2].
>>> * Validation sheet with a tab for 2.9.0 release to help with validation
>>> [7].
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cham
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12344258
>>> [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.9.0/
>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>> [4]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1054/
>>> [5] https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.9.0-RC1
>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7215
>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/584
>>> [8]
>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=2053422529
>>>
>>>

-- 
================
Ruoyun  Huang

Reply via email to