Thanks all for voting. The vote has passed with 7 +1 votes (6 binding) and no -1 votes. I'll complete the remaining work and finalize the release.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 9:03 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote: > Is this vote already closed and the artifacts published? > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:03 PM Connell O'Callaghan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 9:02 AM Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 5:00 AM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> +1, let's get this out. > >>> > >>> We can decide about 2.9.1 later. > >>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 10:43 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > +1 > >>> > > >>> > On 20.12.18 23:11, Tyler Akidau wrote: > >>> > > +1, Approve the release. > >>> > > > >>> > > -Tyler > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:49 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected] > >>> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > I meant BEAM-6249 in my last sentence. It should read: > "BEAM-6249 has a > >>> > > comment about user building the libraries themselves, I am not > sure if they > >>> > > are using the release 2.9 version directly or not." > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:48 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected] > >>> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > +1 > >>> > > > >>> > > I don't think there is a need for a hotfix release. The > reason the > >>> > > initial vendoring PR ( > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7024) that > >>> > > started the issue was not cherry picked to the release > branch. BEAM-6056 > >>> > > has a comment about user building the libraries > themselves, I am not > >>> > > sure if they are using the release 2.9 version directly or > not. > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 9:37 AM Kenneth Knowles < > [email protected] > >>> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > I don't know yet about 2.9.1. There's a bit more > context on BEAM-6249. > >>> > > > >>> > > Kenn > >>> > > > >>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6249 > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:02 PM Scott Wegner < > [email protected] > >>> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > Releasing new vendored artifacts won't generally > imply a full > >>> > > Beam release. The plan is to pick up the new > artifact version at > >>> > > HEAD which will roll into the next release. > >>> > > > >>> > > For this particularly case, the question is if the > Dataflow > >>> > > issue that this fixes (BEAM-6056) warrants a > hotfix release > >>> > > (2.9.1). I don't know the answer-- Ahmet/Kenn do > you have any > >>> > > thoughts? > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:18 AM Ismaël Mejía < > [email protected] > >>> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > Does this imply that we need a subsequent full > release > >>> > > afterwards? > >>> > > I am assuming this new release is related to > the reported > >>> > > issues with > >>> > > the dataflow worker or is this something > different? > >>> > > > >>> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 2:51 AM Kenneth Knowles > >>> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > +1 > >>> > > > > >>> > > > - sigs good > >>> > > > - `jar tf` looks good > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 7:54 PM Scott Wegner > >>> > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> Please review and vote on the release > candidate #1 for > >>> > > the vendored artifact gRPC 1.13.1 v0.2 > >>> > > >> [ ] +1, Approve the release > >>> > > >> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please > provide > >>> > > specific comments) > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> This is a follow-up to the previous thread > about > >>> > > vendoring updates [1] > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> The complete staging area is available for > your review, > >>> > > which includes: > >>> > > >> * all artifacts to be deployed to the > Maven Central > >>> > > Repository [2], > >>> > > >> * commit hash > "3b8abca3ca3352e6bf20e059f17324049a2eae0a" > >>> > > [3], > >>> > > >> * artifacts which are signed with the key > with fingerprint > >>> > > >> 5F47BD54C52008007288FF4D3593BA6C25ABF71F > [4] > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 > hours. It is > >>> > > adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 > PMC > >>> > > affirmative votes. > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> Thanks, > >>> > > >> Scott > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> [1] > >>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9a55d12000cb3b1b61620b7dc4009d1351e6b8c70951f70aeb358583@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > >>> > > >> [2] > >>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1055/ > >>> > > >> [3] > https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/7328 > >>> > > >> [4] > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS > >>> > > >> -- > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback > >>> > > <http://tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback> > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback > >>> > > <https://tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback> > >>> > > > -- Got feedback? tinyurl.com/swegner-feedback
