+1 On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:17 PM Alex Van Boxel <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > (best commits are the once that remove code :-) > _/ > _/ Alex Van Boxel > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:04 PM Manu Zhang <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:57 PM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On 15.05.19 13:19, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> > +1 for removing the code given the current state of things. >>> > >>> > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:32 AM Ruoyun Huang <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> From: Daniel Oliveira <[email protected]> >>> >> Date: Tue, May 14, 2019 at 2:19 PM >>> >> To: dev >>> >> >>> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm calling for a vote on removing the deprecated Java Reference >>> Runner code. The PR for the change has already been tested and reviewed: >>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8380 >>> >>> >>> >>> [ ] +1, Approve merging the removal PR in it's current state >>> >>> [ ] -1, Veto the removal PR (please provide specific comments) >>> >>> >>> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Since this a vote on >>> code-modification, it is adopted if there are at least 3 PMC affirmative >>> votes and no vetoes. >>> >>> >>> >>> For those who would like context on why the Java Reference Runner is >>> being deprecated, the discussions took place in the following email threads: >>> >>> >>> >>> (8 Feb. 2019) Thoughts on a reference runner to invest in? - >>> Decision to deprecate the Java Reference Runner and use the Python >>> FnApiRunner for those use cases instead. >>> >>> (14 Mar. 2019) Python PVR Reference post-commit tests failing - >>> Removal of Reference Runner Post-Commits from Jenkins, and discussion on >>> removal of code. >>> >>> (25 Apr. 2019) Removing Java Reference Runner code - Discussion >>> thread before this formal vote. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> ================ >>> >> Ruoyun Huang >>> >> >>> >>
