Final few things remaining for the release
* Please review https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8667

After which we can
* Release version finalized in JIRA (PMC help needed)
* Release version is listed at reporter.apache.org (PMC help needed)
* Promote the release.

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:02 PM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would suggest have a single way of tracking cherry pick request to an
> RC. Currently we use emails on the RC thread, open PRs, and Jiras tagged
> for the release. This is confusing the person doing the release while they
> are juggling multiple things. How about we ask all cherry pick requests to
> have a JIRA filed against that release and marked as blockers?
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:05 PM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That makes sense.
>> I would also like to add that the corresponding PR should be added to an
>> open blocking Jira
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/BEAM/versions/12345166> for the
>> release to keep a single source to check.
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 12:15 PM Kenneth Knowles <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I would actually suggest that the following search needs to be triaged
>>> to zero before cutting an RC:
>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+base%3Arelease-2.13.0
>>> .
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:17 AM Ankur Goenka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, I missed the comment for not including weekend's to 72 hours
>>>> voting period.
>>>>
>>>> I meant to update the blog post
>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8667/files once we have finalized
>>>> the RC so that it can be consistent. Please add any comments to PR and I
>>>> can incorporate them.
>>>>
>>>> As we did not go for 3rd RC and
>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8714 was not blocking the 2.13
>>>> release, I went with the release.
>>>>
>>>> I have released the maven artifacts for beam. So I suppose, we can not
>>>> do another RC for 2.13.0.
>>>> If we need anything urgently in 2.13 then we can do a bug fix release
>>>> 2.13.1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:59 AM Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This seems a rushed and things fall through the cracks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Max had requested to not include the weekend into the voting period.
>>>>>
>>>>> Valentyn: I had the same question on the first RC. The PR should be
>>>>> included into the vote for review. You can find it here:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8667/files
>>>>>
>>>>> I had requested to include following backport PR before the RC:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8714  - It's not blocking but
>>>>> would be nice if someone can merge it for any future release from this
>>>>> branch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:59 AM Maximilian Michels <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The summary is not correct. Binding votes (in order):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ahmet Altay
>>>>>> Robert Bradshaw
>>>>>> Maximilian Michels
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> Lukasz Cwik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A total of 5 binding votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04.06.19 02:37, Ankur Goenka wrote:
>>>>>> > +1
>>>>>> > Thanks for validating the release and voting.
>>>>>> > With 0(-1), 6(+1) and 3(+1 binding) votes, I am concluding the
>>>>>> voting
>>>>>> > process.
>>>>>> > I am going ahead with the release and will keep the community
>>>>>> posted
>>>>>> > with the updates.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:57 PM Andrew Pilloud <[email protected]
>>>>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     +1 Reviewed the Nexmark java and SQL perfkit graphs, no obvious
>>>>>> >     regressions over the previous release.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >     On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:15 PM Lukasz Cwik <[email protected]
>>>>>> >     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         Thanks for the clarification.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >         On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:40 AM Ankur Goenka <
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> >         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             Yes, i meant i will close the voting at 5pm and start
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> >             release process.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >             On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, 10:59 AM Lukasz Cwik <
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> >             <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                 Ankur, did you mean to say your going to close the
>>>>>> vote
>>>>>> >                 today at 5pm? (and then complete the release
>>>>>> afterwards)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                 On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:54 AM Ankur Goenka
>>>>>> >                 <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                     Thanks for validating and voting.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                     We have 4 binding votes.
>>>>>> >                     I will complete the release today 5PM. Please
>>>>>> raise
>>>>>> >                     any concerns before that.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                     Thanks,
>>>>>> >                     Ankur
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                     On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:36 AM Lukasz Cwik
>>>>>> >                     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                         Since the gearpump issue has been ongoing
>>>>>> since
>>>>>> >                         2.10, I can't consider it a blocker for this
>>>>>> >                         release and am voting +1.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                         On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:13 AM Jean-Baptiste
>>>>>> >                         Onofré <[email protected]
>>>>>> >                         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                             +1 (binding)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                             Quickly tested on beam-samples.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                             Regards
>>>>>> >                             JB
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                             On 31/05/2019 04:52, Ankur Goenka wrote:
>>>>>> >                              > Hi everyone,
>>>>>> >                              >
>>>>>> >                              > Please review and vote on the release
>>>>>> >                             candidate #2 for the version
>>>>>> >                              > 2.13.0, as follows:
>>>>>> >                              >
>>>>>> >                              > [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>> >                              > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release
>>>>>> >                             (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>> >                              >
>>>>>> >                              > The complete staging area is
>>>>>> available
>>>>>> >                             for your review, which includes:
>>>>>> >                              > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>>>> >                              > * the official Apache source release
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> >                             be deployed to dist.apache.org
>>>>>> >                             <http://dist.apache.org>
>>>>>> >                              > <http://dist.apache.org> [2], which
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> >                             signed with the key with
>>>>>> >                              > fingerprint
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>  6356C1A9F089B0FA3DE8753688934A6699985948 [3],
>>>>>> >                              > * all artifacts to be deployed to the
>>>>>> >                             Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>>>> >                              > * source code tag "v2.13.0-RC2" [5],
>>>>>> >                              > * website pull request listing the
>>>>>> >                             release [6] and publishing the API
>>>>>> >                              > reference manual [7].
>>>>>> >                              > * Python artifacts are deployed along
>>>>>> >                             with the source release to the
>>>>>> >                              > dist.apache.org <
>>>>>> http://dist.apache.org>
>>>>>> >                             <http://dist.apache.org> [2].
>>>>>> >                              > * Validation sheet with a tab for
>>>>>> 2.13.0
>>>>>> >                             release to help with validation
>>>>>> >                              > [8].
>>>>>> >                              >
>>>>>> >                              > The vote will be open for at least 72
>>>>>> >                             hours. It is adopted by majority
>>>>>> >                              > approval, with at least 3 PMC
>>>>>> affirmative
>>>>>> >                             votes.
>>>>>> >                              >
>>>>>> >                              > Thanks,
>>>>>> >                              > Ankur
>>>>>> >                              >
>>>>>> >                              > [1]
>>>>>> >                              >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://jira.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12319527&version=12345166
>>>>>> >                              > [2]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.13.0/
>>>>>> >                              > [3]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>> >                              > [4]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1070/
>>>>>> >                              > [5]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.13.0-RC2
>>>>>> >                              > [6]
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8645
>>>>>> >                              > [7]
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/589
>>>>>> >                              > [8]
>>>>>> >                              >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit#gid=1031196952
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >                             --
>>>>>> >                             Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> >                             [email protected] <mailto:
>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>> >                             http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> >                             Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>

Reply via email to