SGTM On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 8:53 AM Ahmet Altay <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks like a nice improvement to me. To make it very explicit, it seems to > focus on compatibility issues with google managed libraries even though the > reports identify general old dependencies as well. > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 6:19 AM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 looks nice and can motivate people to tackle pending upgrades. >> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 12:30 PM Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > We have a pull request to add Pypi dependency compatibility badges to >> > our readme: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/8791 This looks >> > generally useful, though highlights how out of date we still are in >> > some areas. Any thoughts on this? Given the high visibility, I wanted >> > to get some consensus (even if just lazy) before merging. >> > >> > For reference, the badges (and their target links) are >> > >> > [![Compat Check PyPI] >> > >> https://python-compatibility-tools.appspot.com/one_badge_image?package=apache-beam%5Bgcp%5D >> > >> https://python-compatibility-tools.appspot.com/one_badge_target?package=apache-beam%5Bgcp%5D >> > >> > [![Compat Check Github] >> > >> https://python-compatibility-tools.appspot.com/one_badge_image?package=git%2Bgit%3A//github.com/apache/beam.git%23subdirectory%3Dsdks/python >> > >> https://python-compatibility-tools.appspot.com/one_badge_target?package=git%2Bgit%3A//github.com/apache/beam.git%23subdirectory%3Dsdks/python >> >
