+dev
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:35 PM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks a lot Cam for bringing this document to the mailing list (I let > some comments there). There was a recent proposal doc about supporting > async on Beam so you can be interested on taking a look at the > evolution of that [1]. It is definitely interesting for the > implications for IO authors. > > I piggyback a bit this email to make other members of the community > aware of the ongoing work by Cam. He has been a contributor for a > while in the Java IO front, he contributed the IO for DynamoDB and due > to his work there he started working on the update of all the Amazon > Web Services (AWS) related IOs (SNS, SQS, etc) to use the new AWS SDK > (v2), that’s how he got into the Kinesis migration point, btw AWS IO > migration is an ongoing effort so if other people are interested on > contributing into this area, do not hesitate to contact him (or me). > BEAM-7555 [2] for more info. (Sorry for the ad :P) > > Ismaël > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/26d0b7b4f89dcc265fd5deb9cdca3f3bc6daa7cdf2fe56e09b5e7a36@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-7555 > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 2:02 PM Cam Mach <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello Beam Dev, > > > > I have discussed with a couple of Beam dev regarding this topic. We found > > something interesting in the new AWS Kinesis SDK and Libraries V2, so like > > to propose a design for this migration. > > > > Here is the design doc: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XeIVbiDHBReZY8rEI2OWA3cTEQuaR7RPdwGAup6S1DM > > > > I would love to hear from you, your feedback and comments > > > > Thanks, > > Cam > > > >
