Thanks Cham. Tomo, if there are any dependencies you believe are blockers
please mark them.
Also, only the sub-tasks
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20issuetype%20in%20subTaskIssueTypes()%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20dependencies%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC>
seem to be real upgrade tickets (so only ~150).

Back to the original intent of my message, do we have consensus on who will
do the 2.18 release?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:05 PM Tomo Suzuki <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you for response.
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 16:49 Chamikara Jayalath <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 1:04 PM Tomo Suzuki <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Udi,
>>>
>>> (Question) I started learning how Beam dependencies are maintained
>>> through releases. https://beam.apache.org/contribute/dependencies/ says
>>>
>>>
>>> *Beam community has agreed on following policies regarding upgrading
>>> dependencies.*
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> *A significantly outdated dependency (identified manually or through the
>>> automated Jenkins job) should result in a JIRA that is a blocker for the
>>> next release. Release manager may choose to push the blocker to the
>>> subsequent release or downgrade from a blocker.*
>>>
>>>
>>> Is the statement above still valid? We have ~250 automatically created
>>> tickets [1] for dependency upgrade.
>>>
>>
>> I think it's up to the release manager as mentioned in the statement. We
>> surely don't want to block releases by all these JIRAs but Beam community
>> and/or release manager may decide to make some of these blockers if needed.
>> I don't think the tool automatically makes the auto generated JIRAs
>> release blockers.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cham
>>
>>
>>> [1]:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20component%20%3D%20dependencies%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Tomo
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 3:48 PM Udi Meiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The next (2.18) release branch cut is scheduled for Dec 4, according to
>>>> the calendar
>>>> <https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=0p73sl034k80oob7seouanigd0%40group.calendar.google.com>
>>>> .
>>>> I would like to volunteer myself to do this release.
>>>> The plan is to cut the branch on that date, and cherrypick release-blocking
>>>> fixes afterwards if any.
>>>>
>>>> Any unresolved release blocking JIRA issues for 2.18 should have their
>>>> "Fix Version/s" marked as "2.18.0".
>>>>
>>>> Any comments or objections?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Tomo
>>>
>> --
> Regards,
> Tomo
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to